Comanche Generating Station
Comanche Generating Station is a 1,635.3-megawatt (MW) coal-fired power station operated by Public Service Company of Colorado near Pueblo, Colorado.
- 1 Location
- 2 Plant Data
- 3 Unit Retirements
- 4 Background
- 5 Opposition to Comanche 3
- 6 Emissions Data
- 7 Death and disease attributable to fine particle pollution from Comanche Station
- 8 Citizen groups
- 9 Articles and Resources
The undated satellite photo below shows the power station in Pueblo.
- Parent Company: Xcel Energy
- Plant Nameplate Capacity: 1,635.3 MW (Megawatts)
- Units and In-Service Dates: Unit 1: 382.5 MW (1973), Unit 2: 396.0 MW (1975), Unit 3: 856.8 MW (2010)
- Location: 2005 Lime Rd., Pueblo, CO 81006
- GPS Coordinates: 38.208367, -104.575250
- Technology: Subcritical (Unit 1 and 2), Supercritical (Unit 3)
- Coal type: Sub Bituminous
- Coal Consumption:
- Coal Source: Black Thunder Mine (Arch Coal), Belle Ayr Mine (Bluegrass Commodities)
- Number of Employees:
- Unit Retirements: Unit 1 will retire in 2022 and Unit 2 in 2025.
Unit 1 (383 MW) is planned for retirement in 2022, and unit 2 (393 MW) in 2025. The units were commissioned in 1973 and 1975, respectively. Unit 3 (857 MW), commissioned in 2010, will remain operating. By 2026 Xcel plans to generate nearly 55% of its electricity from renewable sources.
In August 2017, Xcel announced that it will retire Unit 1 at the end of 2022 and Unit 2 at the end of 2025. Company president David Eves attributed the retirement to "the fundamental economics of these technologies (wind and solar)." Power from the plant will be replaced by increases in solar, wind, and natural gas generation. According to a report in the Denver Post, the retirement agreement involved more than a dozen parties, including environmental groups, independent power producers, and consumer advocates. Since coal for the plant comes from Wyoming's Powder River Basin, the change will not directly affect production at Colorado mines. As many as 90 fewer workers out of the 172 currently employed will be displaced, but Xcel said it will try to find new jobs for displaced employees. According to the Denver Post article, the coming expiration of tax credits for wind and solar created a limited window of opportunity for developing substitute power sources. As a result of the retirement of the Comanche units, the share of renewables in Xcel's generation mix is expected to rise from 29 percent currently to 55 percent after 2026. By the end of 2017, Xcel will request competitive bids for 1,000 MW of additional wind, 700 MW of solar, and 700 MW of natural gas generation under its "Colorado Energy Plan."
In 2004, Xcel entered into a Settlement Agreement with environmental groups to reduce emissions and install SO2 controls at the existing units. The promised limitations are supposed to result in lower overall pollutants, even with the proposed third unit.
A “least cost resource plan” for Comanche Unit 3 was presented to the Colorado Public Utilities Commission in 2004.
In 2005 Clean Energy Action and Citizens for Clean Air and Water in Pueblo filed a legal complaint challenging the permit on several grounds, including the state’s failure to investigate whether emissions would actually be reduced, the potential for negative impact on surrounding wilderness, and the lack of a public comment period on the permit. The plant has also been controversial because of a proposal to charge Colorado ratepayers for the new plant while it is under construction. As a consequence of the public fallout surrounding this project, Xcel has acknowledged that it may never build another coal-fired power plant.
On January 31, 2007, Dan Friedlander, a member of Clean Energy Action, filed suit against the Colorado Public Utilities Commission (PUC), alleging that the PUC allowed Xcel to violate the "long-standing practices of not charging ratepayers for power plants until they are operational."
As of July 2008, the air permit is under appeal at the Colorado State Supreme Court and a decision has not been reached in the Friedlander case.
In May 2009, Xcel Energy asked state regulators for a $180.2 million electricity rate hike to recoup money spent on power plants and equipment in Colorado. Most of the investment was for the Comanche 3 plant, which is reported to go online later this year.
As of October 2009, the Unit 3 was almost complete, and Xcel expected it to be in service by December 2009.
Comanche 3 began generating electricity July 6 2010.
Both utility executives and environmental leaders say Comanche 3 will likely be Colorado's last coal plant - unless cost-effective carbon capture and sequestration technology with acceptable environmental risks gets developed.
Opposition to Comanche 3
February 26, 2010: ‘Die-in’ at Xcel Headquarters in Denver, Colorado
On February 26, 2010, local citizens in Denver staged a 'die-in' at the headquarters for Xcel Energy in opposition to the utility’s plan to build a new coal-fired power plant, Comanche 3, in Pueblo, Colorado. The plant would be the largest in the coal-fired power station in the state. Protesters cited environmental as well as social and economic issues as reasons for their actions. “Our leaders are failing to lead and Xcel is failing to take their responsibility seriously. Xcel should expect more protests and actions unless they start closing down coal plants and moving Colorado to 100% renewable electricity,” Kate Clark, a Power Past Coal activist. The protest was part of an ongoing series of actions by concerned citizens in Colorado who seek to end coal-power in the state.
- 2006 CO2 Emissions: 5,581,579 tons
- 2006 SO2 Emissions: 13,854 tons
- 2006 SO2 Emissions per MWh:
- 2006 NOx Emissions: 8,411 tons
- 2005 Mercury Emissions: 132 lb.
Death and disease attributable to fine particle pollution from Comanche Station
In 2010, Abt Associates issued a study commissioned by the Clean Air Task Force, a nonprofit research and advocacy organization, quantifying the deaths and other health effects attributable to fine particle pollution from coal-fired power plants. Fine particle pollution consists of a complex mixture of soot, heavy metals, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen oxides. Among these particles, the most dangerous are those less than 2.5 microns in diameter, which are so tiny that they can evade the lung's natural defenses, enter the bloodstream, and be transported to vital organs. Impacts are especially severe among the elderly, children, and those with respiratory disease. The study found that over 13,000 deaths and tens of thousands of cases of chronic bronchitis, acute bronchitis, asthma, congestive heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, dysrhythmia, ischemic heart disease, chronic lung disease, and pneumonia each year are attributable to fine particle pollution from U.S. coal plant emissions. These deaths and illnesses are major examples of coal's external costs, i.e. uncompensated harms inflicted upon the public at large. Low-income and minority populations are disproportionately impacted as well, due to the tendency of companies to avoid locating power plants upwind of affluent communities. To monetize the health impact of fine particle pollution from each coal plant, Abt assigned a value of $7,300,000 to each 2010 mortality, based on a range of government and private studies. Valuations of illnesses ranged from $52 for an asthma episode to $440,000 for a case of chronic bronchitis.
Table 1: Death and disease attributable to fine particle pollution from Comanche Station
|Type of Impact||Annual Incidence||Valuation|
|Asthma ER visits||7||$2,000|
Source: "Find Your Risk from Power Plant Pollution," Clean Air Task Force interactive table, accessed February 2011
- Clean Energy Action
- Environment Colorado
- Rate Payers United of Colorado
- Sierra Club Rocky Mountain Chapter
- Wind Power Solutions
Articles and Resources
- "Xcel 10-k filing 2019" Xcelenergy.com, accessed June 17 2020.
- "Xcel Will Retire Coal, Add Renewables in Latest Plan" powermag.com june 7, 2018
- Form EIA-860, US Energy Information Administration, 2012
- "EIA 923 March 2020" EIA 923 2020.
- "Preliminary Monthly Electric Generator Inventory" eia.gov, 860m March 2020
- Aldo Svaldi, "Xcel Energy plans to retire two coal-fired plants in Pueblo, increase renewables," Denver Post, August 29, 2017
- "Xcel Energy details plan to retire two coal plants, rely more on wind and solar," 9News, June 7, 2018
- "Colorado Coal Plant Proposals", Western Resource Advocates, undated, accessed January 2008.
- "Least-Cost Resource Plan", Xcel Energy corporate website, April 30, 2004 (Pdf).
- "Colorado PUC and the Pueblo Coal Plant: Legal issues 2007-2006", Colorado Clean Energy Action.
- "Xcel Finds That New Coal Plant Is Not Welcome", Environment Colorado, January 28, 2004.
- "Comanche Smokestack a Lightning Rod", Denver Post, November 20, 2007.
- Suit targets Xcel Pueblo plan", Steve Raabe, Denver Post, January 31, 2007.
- "Stopping the Coal Rush", Sierra Club, accessed October 2008.
- "Xcel files to boost rates $180.2 Million", Gargi Chakrabarty, The Denver Post, May 2, 2009.
- "Coal plant construction continues in earnest at some sites," SNL Interactive, October 5, 2009. (Subscription required.)
- "King Coal, politics and the new energy economy: Xcel Energy's Comanche 3 coal-fired plant underscores the debate between "cheap," reliable energy and its costs to the environment" ColoradoBiz, September 1, 2010.
- "Local Citizens ‘Die-in’ at Xcel HQ in Coal Protest Group calls on Xcel to Keep Comanche 3 Closed and Produce 100% Renewable Electricity by 2020" Katie Clark, Colorado Indymedia, February 26, 2010
- "The Toll from Coal: An Updated Assessment of Death and Disease from America's Dirtiest Energy Source," Clean Air Task Force, September 2010.
- "Technical Support Document for the Powerplant Impact Estimator Software Tool," Prepared for the Clean Air Task Force by Abt Associates, July 2010
- Existing Electric Generating Units in the United States, 2005, Energy Information Administration, accessed Jan. 2009.
- Environmental Integrity Project, "Dirty Kilowatts: America’s Most Polluting Power Plants", July 2007.
- Facility Registry System, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, accessed Jan. 2009.
- Carbon Monitoring for Action database, accessed Feb. 2009.
Related SourceWatch Articles
- Comanche Generating Station Unit 3
- Existing U.S. Coal Plants
- Colorado and coal
- Xcel Energy
- United States and coal
- Global warming