Gaston Steam Plant

From Global Energy Monitor
(Redirected from Plant Gaston)

Gaston Steam Plant is an operating power station of at least 2013-megawatts (MW) in Wilsonville, Shelby, Alabama, United States with multiple units, some of which are not currently operating. It is also known as EC Gaston power station.

Location

Table 1: Project-level location details

Plant name Location Coordinates (WGS 84)
Gaston Steam Plant Wilsonville, Shelby, Alabama, United States 33.243164, -86.458936 (exact)

The map below shows the exact location of the power station.

Loading map...


Unit-level coordinates (WGS 84):

  • Unit 1, Unit 2, Unit 3, Unit 4, Unit 5: 33.243164, -86.458936
  • Unit 1, Unit 2, Unit 3, Unit 5, Unit ST4: 33.24421, -86.45806

Project Details

Table 2: Unit-level details

Unit name Status Fuel(s) Capacity (MW) Technology CHP Start year Retired year
Unit 1 retired coal - bituminous 272 subcritical 1960 2016
Unit 1 operating[1] gas, coal[2] 272[1] steam turbine[1] no[1] 2015[1][3] 2028 (planned)
Unit 2 retired coal - bituminous 272 subcritical 1960 2016
Unit 2 operating[1] gas, coal[2] 272[1] steam turbine[1] no[1] 2015[1][3] 2028 (planned)
Unit 3 retired coal - bituminous 272 subcritical 1961 2016
Unit 3 operating[1] gas, coal[2] 272[1] steam turbine[1] no[1] 2015[1][3] 2028 (planned)
Unit 4 retired coal - bituminous 244.8 subcritical 1962 2016
Unit 5 operating coal - bituminous 952 supercritical 1974 2028 (planned)
Unit 5 announced[4][5] gas[4] 952[6] steam turbine[6] no[6] 2028[6][4]
Unit ST4 operating[1] gas, coal[2] 245[1] steam turbine[1] no[1] 2015[1][3] 2028 (planned)

CHP is an abbreviation for Combined Heat and Power. It is a technology that produces electricity and thermal energy at high efficiencies. Coal units track this information in the Captive Use section when known.

Table 3: Unit-level ownership and operator details

Unit name Owner Parent
Unit 1 Alabama Power Co [50.0%], Georgia Power Co [50.0%]
Unit 1 Alabama Power Company [50%]; Georgia Power Company [50%][6] The Southern Company [100.0%]; The Southern Company [100.0%]
Unit 2 Alabama Power Co [50.0%], Georgia Power Co [50.0%]
Unit 2 Alabama Power Company [50%]; Georgia Power Company [50%][6] The Southern Company [100.0%]; The Southern Company [100.0%]
Unit 3 Alabama Power Co [50.0%], Georgia Power Co [50.0%]
Unit 3 Alabama Power Company [50%]; Georgia Power Company [50%][6] The Southern Company [100.0%]; The Southern Company [100.0%]
Unit 4 Alabama Power Co [50.0%], Georgia Power Co [50.0%]
Unit 5 Alabama Power Co [100.0%]
Unit 5 Alabama Power Company [50%]; Georgia Power Company [50%][6] The Southern Company [100.0%]; The Southern Company [100.0%]
Unit ST4 Alabama Power Company [50%]; Georgia Power Company [50%][6] The Southern Company [100.0%]; The Southern Company [100.0%]

Conversion to Natural Gas

In May 2012, Alabama Power disclosed that it plans to have its four smaller generating units at Gaston, representing 1,000 megawatts, converted to run on natural gas by 2015. The project will involve building a gas pipeline to tie into the Transcontinental pipeline, about 30 miles south of the plant. Gaston's largest unit, 880 megawatts, will remain coal-fired. That unit has pollution control devices, and will likely require additional measures to meet new standards of mercury and other air toxics.[7]

In January 2014 the company said it plans to add gas capability to Units 1-4 at its Gaston Steam Plant in Alabama by 2016 so they can run primarily on gas going forward. The other Gaston unit, Unit 5, will be equipped with a baghouse in 2016 to comply with federal regulations, and will continue to use coal.[8]

In June 2015 Power Engineering reported the four units had been recently converted to natural gas.[9]

In late 2021, Southern Company was planning to potentially retrofit unit 5 to burn fossil gas during peak loads. The plan remained subject to state regulatory approval.[10] As of June 2023, the unit still operates as a coal-fired unit[11] and is scheduled to be converted to natural gas by 2028[12].

Emissions Data

  • 2006 CO2 Emissions: 12,345,695 tons
  • 2006 SO2 Emissions: 130,494 tons
  • 2006 SO2 Emissions per MWh:
  • 2006 NOx Emissions: 19,839 tons
  • 2005 Mercury Emissions: 1,077 lbs.

Site for National Carbon Capture Center project

In May 2009 the U.S. Department of Energy announced the launch of the National Carbon Capture Center "to develop and test technologies to capture carbon dioxide (CO2) from coal-based power plants." Announcing the formation of the center in May 2009, the DOE also stated that it would be "managed and operated by Southern Company Services. "Southern Company will establish and manage the NCCC at the Power Systems Development Facility (PSDF) in Wilsonville, Ala.[13] One of the project participants, Arch Coal, stated in a media release that "new facilities to conduct post-combustion testing and evaluation will be on the site of Plant Gaston, a coal-fueled generating plant adjacent to the PSDF that is operated by Southern Company subsidiary Alabama Power."[14]

Gaston Unit 5 is the site of a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Post-Combustion Carbon Capture Center (PC4), which is part of the larger National Carbon Capture Center (NCCC) to develop and test technologies for carbon capture and storage, managed and operated by Southern Company. Initial testing at the PC4 began when researchers used a solvent called monoethanolamine (MEA) to capture CO2 from a slipstream of flue gas from the plant. According to the DOE, the unit is in steady operation and capturing about 10 tons of CO2 per day. In addition to DOE and Southern Company, participants in the NCCC include American Electric Power, Arch Coal, EPRI, Luminant, NRG Energy, Peabody Energy, and Rio Tinto.[15]

Coal waste

Gaston ranked 14th on list of most polluting power plants in terms of coal waste

In January 2009, Sue Sturgis of the Institute of Southern Studies compiled a list of the 100 most polluting coal plants in the United States in terms of coal combustion waste (CCW) stored in surface impoundments like the one involved in the TVA Kingston Fossil Plant coal ash spill.[16] The data came from the EPA's Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) for 2006, the most recent year available.[17]

Gaston Steam Plant ranked number 14 on the list, with 2,306,006 pounds of coal combustion waste released to surface impoundments in 2006.[16]

EPA "high hazard" dam

In November 2011, the EPA released a new set of coal waste data that revealed 181 “significant” hazard dams in 18 states - more than three times the 60 significant-hazard ponds listed in the original database released in 2009. In addition to the increase in the number of significant hazard-rated ponds, eight previously unrated coal ash ponds were found to be high hazard ponds in information released by the EPA earlier in 2011. Because of the switch in ratings after the EPA inspections, the total number of high hazard ponds has stayed roughly the same at a total of 47 ponds nationwide.[18]

According to the National Inventory of Dams (NID) criteria, “high” hazard coal ash ponds are categorized as such because their failure will likely cause loss of human life. Six states that gained high hazard ponds include:[18]

Citizen Groups

See also Alabama and coal

Articles and Resources

References

  1. 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.13 1.14 1.15 1.16 1.17 1.18 1.19 "U.S. Energy Information Administration, Preliminary Monthly Electric Generator Inventory (November 2019)". Archived from the original on June 12, 2020. Retrieved September 10, 2021.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 "U.S. Energy Information Administration, Preliminary Monthly Electric Generator Inventory (July 2021)". Archived from the original on November 22, 2021. Retrieved October 13, 2021.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 https://web.archive.org/web/20221012102750/https://www.power-eng.com/news/. Archived from the original on 12 October 2022. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 https://web.archive.org/web/20230122210736/https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-news-headlines/southern-co-plans-to-retire-repower-fossil-fueled-plants-67673301. Archived from the original on 22 January 2023. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  5. https://web.archive.org/web/20230515003005/https://ashtracker.org/facility/344/ec-gaston-steam-plant. Archived from the original on 15 May 2023. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.8 "U.S. Energy Information Administration, Preliminary Monthly Electric Generator Inventory (April 2022)". Archived from the original on July 12, 2022. Retrieved June 10, 2022.
  7. Thomas Spencer, "Alabama Power to connect Shelby plant to natural gas line," The Birmingham News, May 12, 2012.
  8. "Southern to repower three Alabama coal power plants with natgas," Reuters, Jan 16, 2014
  9. "Coal-To-Gas Plant Conversions in the U.S.," Power Engineering, 06/18/2015
  10. "Southern Co. plans to retire, repower fossil-fueled plants," S&P Global, December 6, 2021
  11. "Generating Plants". Alabama Power. Retrieved June 21, 2023.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  12. "E.C. Gaston Steam Plant". Ashtracker. October 13, 2022. Retrieved June 21, 2023.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  13. U.S. Department of Energy, "DOE Establishes National Carbon Capture Center to Speed Deployment of CO2 Capture Processes: Center Will Provide Flexible Test Bed for Emerging CO2 Capture Technologies for Coal-Fired Power Plants", Media Release, May 27, 2009.
  14. Arch Coal, "Arch Coal Joins National Carbon Capture Center", Media Release, May 27, 2009.
  15. "National Carbon Capture Center Launches Post-Combustion Test Center" NETL, June 7, 2011.
  16. 16.0 16.1 Sue Sturgis, "Coal's ticking timebomb: Could disaster strike a coal ash dump near you?," Institute for Southern Studies, January 4, 2009.
  17. TRI Explorer, EPA, accessed January 2009.
  18. 18.0 18.1 Ken Ward Jr., "EPA data reveals more dangerous coal ash ponds" Coal Tattoo, Oct. 31, 2011.

Additional data

To access additional data, including interactive maps of the power stations, downloadable datases, and summary data, please visit the Global Coal Plant Tracker and the Global Oil and Gas Plant Tracker on the Global Energy Monitor website.