Craig Station

From Global Energy Monitor
Part of the
Global Coal Plant Tracker,
a Global Energy Monitor project.
Download full dataset
Report an error
Related coal trackers:

Craig Station is an operating power station of at least 1427-megawatts (MW) in Craig, Moffat, Colorado, United States. It is also known as Yampa project (Unit 1, Unit 2).

Location

Table 1: Project-level location details

Plant name Location Coordinates (WGS 84)
Craig Station Craig, Moffat, Colorado, United States 40.4627, -107.591153 (exact)
Loading map...

Unit-level coordinates (WGS 84):

  • Unit 1, Unit 2, Unit 3: 40.4627, -107.591153

Project Details

Table 2: Unit-level details

Unit name Status Fuel(s) Capacity (MW) Technology Start year Retired year
Unit 1 Operating[1] coal: subbituminous 446.4 subcritical 1980 2026 (planned)[1]
Unit 2 Operating coal: subbituminous 446.4 subcritical 1979 2028 (planned)[2]
Unit 3 Operating coal: subbituminous 534.8 subcritical 1984 2028 (planned)[2]

Table 3: Unit-level ownership and operator details

Unit name Owner Parent
Unit 1 Public Service Company of Colorado [9%]; Platte River Power Authority [18%]; Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association Inc [24%]; PacifiCorp [19%]; Salt River Project [29%] Salt River Project [29.0%]; Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association Inc [24.0%]; Berkshire Hathaway Inc [19.3%]; Platte River Power Authority [18.0%]; Xcel Energy Inc [9.7%]
Unit 2 Public Service Company of Colorado [9%]; Platte River Power Authority [18%]; Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association Inc [24%]; PacifiCorp [19%]; Salt River Project [29%] Salt River Project [29.0%]; Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association Inc [24.0%]; Berkshire Hathaway Inc [19.3%]; Platte River Power Authority [18.0%]; Xcel Energy Inc [9.7%]
Unit 3 Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association Inc [100%] Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association Inc [100.0%]

Financing

Retirement plans

In September 2016, it was reported Craig Station Unit 1, a 446 MW unit built in 1979, will be shut down by December 31, 2025.[8] Unit 2 (also 446 MW) was planned for retirement in 2026.[9]

During a media call on January 9, 2020 executives from Tri-State Generation and Transmission said that Units 2 and 3 will retire in 2030 and Unit 1 was still on schedule for retirement in 2025. Before the announcement, Units 2 and 3 were scheduled for closure in 2038 and 2044, respectively.[10]

In July 2020, S&P Global reported that Tri-State announced that unit 2 would close in September of 2028 instead of 2030.[11] In November 2020, the Air Quality Control Commission approved Colorado’s regional haze plan, requiring unit 3 to also close by 2028.[12]

However, in December 2020, the Colorado Air Quality Control Commission voted to reverse the plan. The about-face followed objections from utilities and the Colorado Energy Office, which was coordinating Gov. Jared Polis’ efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.[13]

In December 2023, Tri-State filed an updated resource plan with the Colorado Public Utilities Commission proposing that all three units be retired by the end of 2028. Unit 3 was slated to retire in January 2028, and Unit 2 was slated to retire in September 2028.[14]

In April 2025, Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association reaffirmed its intention to retire Unit 1 by the end of 2025, and retire Units 2 and 3 in 2028.[15][16]

As of October 2025, the Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association was reportedly expecting to receive an emergency order from the federal government to keep Unit 1 operating past 2025.[17]

Department of Energy orders Craig coal unit to stay online

On December 30, 2025, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) ordered Craig Station Unit 1 to keep operating past its previously planned retirement date at the end of 2025. The 90-day emergency order was in effect until March 30, 2026.[18] According to the plant’s operator, Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Unit 1 was offline as of December 19, 2025, following a mechanical failure. Tri-State reportedly said that restarting the unit “will likely require additional investments in operations, repairs, maintenance and, potentially, fuel supply, all factors increasing costs.”[19]

In January 2026, the Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association and the Platte River Power Authority requested a rehearing of the emergency order, arguing that the DOE violated their Constitutional rights by requiring them to keep Craig Unit 1 operating. The utilities stated that the DOE’s action constituted a ‘taking’ of their property without compensation or due process. In addition, the utilities argued that while Energy Secretary Chris Wright invoked emergency powers to issue the order, there “is no such emergency” and the order “disrupts a considered resource planning effort”.[20]

In March 2028, the Sierra Club, Vote Solar, and Environmental Defense filed an appeal with the federal court against the DOE’s order to keep Craig Unit 1 online.[21]

In late March 2026, the DOE issued another order to keep Craig Unit 1 operating through June 28, 2026.[22]

Emissions Data

  • 2024 Gross Load (MWh): 5,067,823[23]
  • 2024 SO2 Mass (short tons): 1,304[23]
  • 2024 CO2 Mass (short tons): 5,879,473[23]
  • 2024 NOx Mass (short tons): 4,332[23]
  • 2023 Mercury emissions (Hg, lb): 29.58[24][25]

Pollution exemptions

In July 2025, the Trump administration issued an executive order exempting coal units at Cardinal Plant, Craig Station, and Dallman Station from complying with pollution limits in the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) until July 9, 2029. While pollution equipment was available to meet the standards, the order claimed compliance was not possible as the tougher 2024 standards required technologies “that do not yet exist in a commercially viable form.” Units 2 and 3 at Craig Station received the exemption.[26][27]

Death and disease attributable to fine particle pollution from Craig Station

In 2010, Abt Associates issued a study commissioned by the Clean Air Task Force, a nonprofit research and advocacy organization, quantifying the deaths and other health effects attributable to fine particle pollution from coal-fired power plants.[28] Fine particle pollution consists of a complex mixture of soot, heavy metals, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen oxides. Among these particles, the most dangerous are those less than 2.5 microns in diameter, which are so tiny that they can evade the lung's natural defenses, enter the bloodstream, and be transported to vital organs. Impacts are especially severe among the elderly, children, and those with respiratory disease. The study found that over 13,000 deaths and tens of thousands of cases of chronic bronchitis, acute bronchitis, asthma, congestive heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, dysrhythmia, ischemic heart disease, chronic lung disease, and pneumonia each year are attributable to fine particle pollution from U.S. coal plant emissions. These deaths and illnesses are major examples of coal's external costs, i.e. uncompensated harms inflicted upon the public at large. Low-income and minority populations are disproportionately impacted as well, due to the tendency of companies to avoid locating power plants upwind of affluent communities. To monetize the health impact of fine particle pollution from each coal plant, Abt assigned a value of $7,300,000 to each 2010 mortality, based on a range of government and private studies. Valuations of illnesses ranged from $52 for an asthma episode to $440,000 for a case of chronic bronchitis.[29]

Table 1: Death and disease attributable to fine particle pollution from Craig Station

Type of Impact Annual Incidence Valuation
Deaths 24 $170,000,000
Heart attacks 36 $400,000,000
Asthma attacks 440 $23,000
Hospital admissions 16 $380,000
Chronic bronchitis 16 $6,900,000
Asthma ER visits 22 $8,000

Source: "Find Your Risk from Power Plant Pollution," Clean Air Task Force interactive table, accessed February 2011

Citizen groups

Articles and Resources

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 "Trump administration orders aging Colorado coal plant to stay open, one day before closing". Colorado Public Radio. 2025-12-31. Retrieved 2026-01-05. {{cite web}}: |archive-url= is malformed: timestamp (help)
  2. 2.0 2.1 https://tristate.coop/tri-state-files-ERP-implementation-plan. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  3. "Pacificorp 10-k 2019" bkenergy.com accessed June 17, 2020
  4. "Craig units 1 & 2 (Yampa Project)," Platte River Power Authority, accessed June 2020
  5. "Craig Generating Station" srpnet.com, accessed June 17, 2020
  6. "Xcel 10-k filing 2019" Xcelenergy.com, accessed June 17, 2020.
  7. "Tri-State Generation to close all 3 of its Colorado, New Mexico coal-fired power plants and coal mines by 2030" craigdailypress.com January 9, 2020
  8. "More than 500 megawatts of coal-based power to be shut down in Colorado," Denver Business Journal, Sep 1, 2016
  9. "PacifiCorp to add 7 GW renewables + storage, close 20 of 24 coal plants," Utility Dive, Oct 3, 2019
  10. "Tri-State to retire mine, Escalante and Craig coal-fired power plants decades early" S&P Global.com, January 10, 2020
  11. "In Colorado, retirement date set for coal-fired Craig Station unit" S&P Global.com, July 8, 2020
  12. "Regional Haze Plan Calls for Earlier Retirement for Colorado Coal-Fired Power Plants," Earthjustice, November 20, 2020
  13. "Colorado Air Regulators Scrap Plans To Accelerate Coal Power Plant Retirements," CPR News, December 18, 2020
  14. "Tri-State aims to close Craig Station earlier than originally expected," Craig Press, December 1, 2023
  15. “Reliable, lowest-cost, reduced emissions preferred portfolio focus of Tri-State resource plan filing,” Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, April 11, 2025
  16. “Coal-fired power plant in northwestern Colorado still set for 2028 closure despite Trump administration orders,” The Colorado Sun, April 15, 2025
  17. “Will feds order Colorado coal units to stay open?,” Big Pivots, November 3, 2025
  18. “Trump administration orders aging Colorado coal plant to stay open, one day before closing,” Colorado Public Radio, December 31, 2025
  19. “Trump administration forces coal power plant in northwestern Colorado to continue operating,” The Colorado Sun, December 31, 2025
  20. “Coal plant owners say DOE ‘emergency’ order to run it violates Constitution,” Utility Dive, February 2, 2026
  21. “Groups Take Trump Administration to Court Over Illegal Craig Coal Plant Extension,” Sierra Club, March 18, 2026
  22. “US Energy Department extends emergency order preventing Craig coal plant from shutting down,” The Aspen Times, March 30, 2026
  23. 23.0 23.1 23.2 23.3 EIA (2024). "Clean Air Markets Program Data (CAMD)". Retrieved 2025-02-20.
  24. Clean Air and Power Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (February 2024). "Annual data 2022 vs. 2023". Retrieved 2025-03-04.
  25. Toxics Release Inventory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (October 2024). "2023 Basic Plus Data". Retrieved 2025-03-04.
  26. “Trump Halts Clean Air Laws For Most of the Country,” Earthjustice, July 18, 2025
  27. “Regulatory Relief for Certain Stationary Sources to Further Promote American Energy,” The White House, July 17, 2025
  28. "The Toll from Coal: An Updated Assessment of Death and Disease from America's Dirtiest Energy Source," Clean Air Task Force, September 2010.
  29. "Technical Support Document for the Powerplant Impact Estimator Software Tool," Prepared for the Clean Air Task Force by Abt Associates, July 2010

Additional data

To access additional data, including an interactive map of coal-fired power stations, a downloadable dataset, and summary data, please visit the Global Coal Plant Tracker on the Global Energy Monitor website.