George Neal Station North

From Global Energy Monitor
Part of the
Global Coal Plant Tracker,
a Global Energy Monitor project.
Download full dataset
Report an error
Related coal trackers:

George Neal Station North is an operating power station of at least 584-megawatts (MW) in Sioux City, Woodbury, Iowa, United States with multiple units, some of which are not currently operating.

Location

Table 1: Project-level location details

Plant name Location Coordinates (WGS 84)
George Neal Station North Sioux City, Woodbury, Iowa, United States 42.325833, -96.381361 (exact)

The map below shows the exact location of the power station.

Loading map...


Unit-level coordinates (WGS 84):

  • Unit 1, Unit 2, Unit 3: 42.325833, -96.381361

Project Details

Table 2: Unit-level details

Unit name Status Fuel(s) Capacity (MW) Technology Start year Retired year
Unit 1 retired coal - subbituminous 147 subcritical 1964 2016
Unit 2 retired coal - subbituminous 349.2 subcritical 1972 2016
Unit 3 operating coal - subbituminous 584.1 subcritical 1975

Table 3: Unit-level ownership and operator details

Unit name Owner
Unit 1 MidAmerican Energy Co [100.0%]
Unit 2 MidAmerican Energy Co [100.0%]
Unit 3 MidAmerican Energy Co [72.0%], Interstate Power and Light Co [28.0%]

Financing

Unit Retirement

According to a January 2013 agreement between MidAmerican Energy and the Sierra Club, boiler one and boiler two (147 MW and 349 MW respectively) will be retired by April 16, 2016.[3][4] They were retired April 30, 2016.[5]

Alliant Energy Coal Exit

In 2020, Interstate Power and Light parent company, Alliant Energy set an “aspiration” to reach net-zero carbon by 2050 and eliminate all coal power plants from its fleet by 2040.[6]

Emissions Data

  • CO2 Emissions: 7,043,476 tons (2006), 6,740,283.49 tons (2008)[7]
  • SO2 Emissions: 21,539 tons (2006), 20,571.10 tons (2008)[8]
  • SO2 Emissions per MWh:
  • NOx Emissions: 11,121 tons (2006), 8,911.85 tons (2008)[8]
  • Mercury Emissions: 260 lb. (2005)

Death and disease attributable to fine particle pollution from George Neal North

In 2010, Abt Associates issued a study commissioned by the Clean Air Task Force, a nonprofit research and advocacy organization, quantifying the deaths and other health effects attributable to fine particle pollution from coal-fired power plants.[9] Fine particle pollution consists of a complex mixture of soot, heavy metals, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen oxides. Among these particles, the most dangerous are those less than 2.5 microns in diameter, which are so tiny that they can evade the lung's natural defenses, enter the bloodstream, and be transported to vital organs. Impacts are especially severe among the elderly, children, and those with respiratory disease. The study found that over 13,000 deaths and tens of thousands of cases of chronic bronchitis, acute bronchitis, asthma, congestive heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, dysrhythmia, ischemic heart disease, chronic lung disease, and pneumonia each year are attributable to fine particle pollution from U.S. coal plant emissions. These deaths and illnesses are major examples of coal's external costs, i.e. uncompensated harms inflicted upon the public at large. Low-income and minority populations are disproportionately impacted as well, due to the tendency of companies to avoid locating power plants upwind of affluent communities. To monetize the health impact of fine particle pollution from each coal plant, Abt assigned a value of $7,300,000 to each 2010 mortality, based on a range of government and private studies. Valuations of illnesses ranged from $52 for an asthma episode to $440,000 for a case of chronic bronchitis.[10]

Table 1: Death and disease attributable to fine particle pollution from George Neal North

Type of Impact Annual Incidence Valuation
Deaths 17 $120,000,000
Heart attacks 26 $2,800,000
Asthma attacks 280 $15,000
Hospital admissions 12 $280,000
Chronic bronchitis 10 $4,600,000
Asthma ER visits 18 $7,000

Source: "Find Your Risk from Power Plant Pollution," Clean Air Task Force interactive table, accessed April 2011

George Neal North ranked 51st on list of most polluting power plants in terms of coal waste

In January 2009, Sue Sturgis of the Institute of Southern Studies compiled a list of the 100 most polluting coal plants in the United States in terms of coal combustion waste (CCW) stored in surface impoundments like the one involved in the TVA Kingston Fossil Plant coal ash spill.[11] The data came from the EPA's Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) for 2006, the most recent year available.[12]

George Neal Station North ranked number 51 on the list, with 612,005 pounds of coal combustion waste released to surface impoundments in 2006.[11]

Coal Ash Waste and Water Contamination

In August 2010, a study released by the Environmental Integrity Project, the Sierra Club and Earthjustice, "In Harm's Way: Lack of Federal Coal Ash Regulations Endangers Americans and their Environment," reported that Iowa had significant groundwater contamination from coal ash.[13]The report identified 39 coal combustion waste (CCW) disposal sites in 21 states that have contaminated groundwater or surface water with toxic metals and other pollutants, including George Neal Station North, based on monitoring data and other information available in state agency files. The report built on an earlier 2010 report by the Environmental Integrity Project and Earthjustice, "Out of Control: Mounting Damages from Coal Ash Waste Sites", which documented similar damage at another 31 coal combustion waste dumpsites in 14 states. When added to the 67 damage cases that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) has already acknowledged, the total number of sites polluted by coal ash or coal scrubber sludge comes to at least 137 in 34 states.

"In Harm's Way: Lack of Federal Coal Ash Regulations Endangers Americans and their Environment" found that the coal ash site for the George Neal Station North had exceeded the Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) for arsenic at all six wells since 2011, at levels 22 times the MCL. In 2010, MCL for arsenic was exceeded in 15 wells. High levels of iron, manganese and sulfate were also in groundwater downgradient from the monofill.[14]

Other coal waste sites

To see a nationwide list of over 350 coal waste sites in the United States, click here. To see a listing of coal waste sites in a particular state, click on the map:

Category:Existing coal waste sites in AlabamaCategory:Existing coal waste sites in AlaskaCategory:Existing coal waste sites in ArizonaCategory:Existing coal waste sites in ArkansasCategory:Existing coal waste sites in CaliforniaCategory:Existing coal waste sites in ColoradoCategory:Existing coal waste sites in ConnecticutCategory:Existing coal waste sites in DelawareCategory:Existing coal waste sites in FloridaCategory:Existing coal waste sites in GeorgiaCategory:Existing coal waste sites in HawaiiCategory:Existing coal waste sites in IdahoCategory:Existing coal waste sites in IllinoisCategory:Existing coal waste sites in IndianaCategory:Existing coal waste sites in IowaCategory:Existing coal waste sites in KansasCategory:Existing coal waste sites in KentuckyCategory:Existing coal waste sites in LouisianaCategory:Existing coal waste sites in MaineCategory:Existing coal waste sites in MarylandCategory:Existing coal waste sites in MassachusettsCategory:Existing coal waste sites in MichiganCategory:Existing coal waste sites in MinnesotaCategory:Existing coal waste sites in MississippiCategory:Existing coal waste sites in MissouriCategory:Existing coal waste sites in MontanaCategory:Existing coal waste sites in NebraskaCategory:Existing coal waste sites in NevadaCategory:Existing coal waste sites in New HampshireCategory:Existing coal waste sites in New JerseyCategory:Existing coal waste sites in New MexicoCategory:Existing coal waste sites in New YorkCategory:Existing coal waste sites in North CarolinaCategory:Existing coal waste sites in North DakotaCategory:Existing coal waste sites in OhioCategory:Existing coal waste sites in OklahomaCategory:Existing coal waste sites in OregonCategory:Existing coal waste sites in PennsylvaniaCategory:Existing coal waste sites in Rhode IslandCategory:Existing coal waste sites in South CarolinaCategory:Existing coal waste sites in South DakotaCategory:Existing coal waste sites in TennesseeCategory:Existing coal waste sites in TexasCategory:Existing coal waste sites in UtahCategory:Existing coal waste sites in VermontCategory:Existing coal waste sites in VirginiaCategory:Existing coal waste sites in Washington StateCategory:Existing coal waste sites in West VirginiaCategory:Existing coal waste sites in WisconsinCategory:Existing coal waste sites in WyomingExisting coal waste sites in DelawareExisting coal waste sites in MarylanExisting coal waste sites in New HampshireExisting coal waste sites in New JerseyExisting coal waste sites in MassachusettsExisting coal waste sites in ConnecticutExisting coal waste sites in West VirginiaExisting coal waste sites in VermontExisting coal waste sites in Rhode IslandMap of USA with state names.png
About this image

Articles and Resources

References

  1. "Pacificorp 10-k 2019" bkenergy.com accessed June 17,2020
  2. "Alliant Energy 10-k filing" alliantenergy.gcs.web.com, accessed June 17,2020
  3. "Consent Decree between Sierra Club and MidAmerican Energy Company, US District Court, Southern District of Iowa, Case No. 13-CV-21," page 6
  4. Form EIA-860 Data - Schedule 3, 'Generator Data' US EIA, 2014
  5. Sierra Club list of US coal plant retirements, Oct. 5, 2016
  6. "Wisconsin Utility Alliant Energy Pledges Net-Zero Carbon by 2050" greentechmedia.com, July 23, 2020
  7. Iowa Operating Permit Application, Title V Annual Emissions Summary
  8. 8.0 8.1 Iowa Operating Permit Application, Form 5.0, Title V Annual Emissions Summary
  9. "The Toll from Coal: An Updated Assessment of Death and Disease from America's Dirtiest Energy Source," Clean Air Task Force, September 2010.
  10. "Technical Support Document for the Powerplant Impact Estimator Software Tool," Prepared for the Clean Air Task Force by Abt Associates, July 2010
  11. 11.0 11.1 Sue Sturgis, "Coal's ticking timebomb: Could disaster strike a coal ash dump near you?," Institute for Southern Studies, January 4, 2009.
  12. TRI Explorer, EPA, accessed January 2009.
  13. "Enviro groups: ND, SD coal ash polluting water" Associated Press, August 24, 2010.
  14. Jeff Stant, "In Harm's Way: Lack of Federal Coal Ash Regulations Endangers Americans and their Environment," EarthJustice, Environmental Integrity Project, and Sierra Club report, August 26, 2010.

Additional data

To access additional data, including an interactive map of coal-fired power stations, a downloadable dataset, and summary data, please visit the Global Coal Plant Tracker on the Global Energy Monitor website.