Nord Stream Gas Pipeline

From Global Energy Monitor
This article is part of the Global Fossil Infrastructure Tracker, a project of Global Energy Monitor.
Sub-articles:

Nord Stream Gas Pipeline, also called the Northern European Gas Pipeline, is an operating natural gas pipeline.[1]

Location

The pipeline runs from Vyborg, Russia through the Baltic Sea to Greifswald, Germany.[2] [3]

Loading map...

Project Details

  • Operator: Nord Stream AG
  • Parent Company: Gazprom 51%, Wintershall 15.5%, PEG Infrastruktur AG (Uniper) 15.5%, Gasunie 9%, Engie 9%
  • Current capacity: 55 billion cubic meters per year
  • Length: 759 miles / 1,222 kilometers
  • Status: Operating
  • Start Year: 2011

Background

Nord Stream is an offshore natural gas pipeline from Vyborg in the Russian Federation to Greifswald in Germany that is owned and operated by Nord Stream AG. The project includes two parallel lines. The first line was laid by May 2011 and was inaugurated on 8 November 2011.[4][5] The second line was laid in 2011–2012 and was inaugurated on 8 October 2012. At 1,222 km (759 mi) in length, it is the longest subsea pipeline in the world, surpassing the Langeled pipeline.[6][7] It has an annual capacity of 55 billion cubic meters (1.9 trillion cubic feet), but its capacity is planned to be doubled to 110 billion cubic meters (3.9 trillion cubic feet by 2019, by laying two additional lines.[8] Due to EU restrictions on Gazprom, only 22.5 billion cubic meters (790 billion cubic feet) of its capacity is actually used.[9] The name occasionally has a wider meaning, including the feeding onshore pipeline in the Russian Federation, and further connections in Western Europe.

History

The original pipeline project started in 1997 when Gazprom and the Finnish company Neste (which in 1998 merged with Imatran Voima to form Fortum, and in 2004 separated again to Fortum and Neste Oil) formed the joint company North Transgas Oy for construction and operation of a gas pipeline from Russia to Northern Germany across the Baltic Sea.[10] North Transgas cooperated with the German gas company Ruhrgas (which later became part of E.ON). A route survey in the Exclusive Economic Zones of Finland, Sweden, Denmark and Germany, and a feasibility study of the pipeline was conducted in 1998. Several routes were considered including routes with onshore segments through Finland and Sweden.[11]

On 24 April 2001, Gazprom, Fortum, Ruhrgas and Wintershall adopted a statement regarding a joint feasibility study for construction of the pipeline.[12] On 18 November 2002, the Management Committee of Gazprom approved a schedule of project implementation. In May 2005, Fortum withdrew from the project and sold its stake in North Transgas to Gazprom. As a result, Gazprom became the only shareholder of North Transgas Oy.[10][13]

On 8 September 2005, Gazprom, BASF and E.ON signed a basic agreement on the construction of a North European Gas Pipeline. On 30 November 2005, the North European Gas Pipeline Company (later renamed Nord Stream AG) was incorporated in Zug, Switzerland. On 9 December 2005, Gazprom started construction of the Russian onshore feeding pipeline. On 4 October 2006, the pipeline and the operating company were officially renamed Nord Stream AG.[14] After establishment of Nord Stream AG, all information related to the pipeline project, including results of the seabed survey of 1998, were transferred from North Transgas to the new company, and on 2 November 2006, North Transgas was officially dissolved.[15]

The environmental impact assessment started on 16 November 2006 with notification sent to Russia, Finland, Sweden, Denmark and Germany, as parties of origin (the countries whose exclusive economic zones and/or territorial waters the pipeline is planned to pass through), as well as to Poland, Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia as affected parties.[16] The final report on transboundary environmental impact assessment was delivered on 9 March 2009.[17]

On 19 March 2007, Nord Stream AG contracted with Italian company Snamprogetti, a subsidiary of Saipem, for design engineering of the pipeline.[18] A letter of intent for construction was signed with Saipem on 17 September 2007 and the contract was concluded on 24 June 2008.[19][20] On 25 September 2007, the pipe supply contracts were awarded to the pipe producers Salzgitter AG and OMK, and on 18 February 2008, the concrete weight coating and logistics services agreement was awarded to EUPEC PipeCoatings S.A.[21][22] The supply contracts for the second line were awarded to OMK, Europipe and Sumitomo Heavy Industries on 22 January 2010.[23] On 30 December 2008 Rolls-Royce plc was awarded a contract to supply gas turbines driving centrifugal compressors and on 8 January 2009, Royal Boskalis Westminster and Danish Dredging Contractor Rohde Nielsen A/S. were awarded a joint venture seabed dredging contract.[24][25]

The agreement to make Gasunie the consortium's fourth partner was signed on 6 November 2007.[26] On 10 June 2008, Gasunie was included in the register of shareholders.[27] On 1 March 2010, French energy company GDF Suez signed with Gazprom a memorandum of understanding to acquire 9% stake in the project.[28] The transaction was closed in July 2010.[29]

In August 2008, Nord Stream AG hired former Finnish prime minister Paavo Lipponen as a consultant to help speed up the application process in Finland and to serve as a link between Nord Stream and Finnish authorities.[30]

On 21 December 2007, Nord Stream AG submitted application documents to the Swedish government for pipeline construction in the Swedish Exclusive Economic Zone.[31] On 12 February 2008, the Swedish government rejected the consortium's application which it had found incomplete.[32][33] A new application was filed later. On 20 October 2009, Nord Stream received a construction permit to build the pipeline in Danish waters.[34] On 5 November 2009, the Swedish and Finnish authorities gave a permit to lay the pipeline in their exclusive economic zones.[35] On 22 February 2010, the Regional State Administrative Agency for Southern Finland issued the final environmental permit allowing construction of the Finnish section of the pipeline.[36][37]

On 15 January 2010 construction of the Portovaya compressor station in Vyborg near the Gulf of Finland began.[38] [39] The first pipe of the pipeline was laid on 6 April 2010 in the Swedish exclusive economic zone by the Castoro Sei vessel. In addition to Castoro Sei, also Castoro 10 and Solitaire were contracted for pipe-laying works.[40] Construction of the pipeline was officially launched on 9 April 2010 at Portovaya Bay.[41]

The laying of the first line was completed on 4 May 2011 (the last pipe put in place), while all underwater works on the first line were completed on 21 June 2011.[7][42] In August 2011, Nord Stream was connected with the OPAL pipeline.[43] Gas was first pumped into the first line on 6 September 2011.[44]

The pipeline was officially inaugurated by the German Chancellor Angela Merkel, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev and French Prime Minister François Fillon on 8 November 2011 at the ceremony held in Lubmin.[4][5][45] Initially, the pipeline was able to deliver 27.5 billion cubic meters (970 billion cubic feet) of gas annually, but this capacity was doubled once the second pipeline was finished.[46] Construction of the second line was completed in August 2012 and it was inaugurated on 8 October 2012.[47][48][49]

Technical features

Russian onshore pipeline

Construction of the feeding pipeline in Russia (Gryazovets–Vyborg gas pipeline) began on 9 December 2005 in the town of Babayevo in Vologda Oblast. It was completed in 2010. This pipeline is operated solely by Gazprom.[50] It is a part of the integrated gas transport network of Russia connecting the existing grid in Gryazovets with the coastal compressor station at Vyborg.[51] The length of this pipeline is 917 km (576 mi), the diameter of the pipe is 1420 mm (56 in), and working pressure is 100 atm (10 MPa), which is secured by six compressor stations. The Gryazovets-Vyborg pipeline, parallel to the branch of the Northern Lights pipeline, also supplies gas to the Northwestern Federal Districtof Russia (Saint Petersburg and Leningrad Oblast).[50] A branch pipeline in Karelia will connect this feeding pipeline with Finland.[52]

Baltic Sea offshore pipeline

The Nord Stream offshore pipeline is ordered and operated by Nord Stream AG.[16][26] It runs from Vyborg compressor station at Portovaya Bay along the bottom of the Baltic Sea to Greifswald in Germany. The length of the subsea pipeline is 1,222 km (759 mi), of which 1.5 km (.93 mi) is in Russian inland, 121.8 km (65.8 nmi) in Russian territorial waters, 1.4 km (.8 nmi) in the Russian Exclusive Economic Zone, 375.3 km (202.6 nmi) in the Finnish economic zone, 506.4 km (273.4 nmi) in the Swedish economic zone, 87.7 km (47.4 nmi) in Danish territorial waters, 49.9 km (26.9 nmi) in the Danish economic zone, 31.2 km (19.3 nmi) in the German economic zone, 49.9 km (26.9 nmi) in German territorial waters and .5 km (.31 mi) on land in Germany.[53] The pipeline has two parallel lines, each with capacity of 27.5 billion cubic meters (970 billion cubic feet) of natural gas per year. Pipes have a diameter of 1220 mm (48 in), a wall thickness of 38 mm (1.5 in) and a working pressure of 220 bars (22 MPa).[16]

Nord Stream AG is studying the viability of building the third and fourth lines.[54]

Western European pipelines

The Western European part of the project includes two transmission pipelines in Germany. The southern pipeline (OPAL pipeline) runs from Greifswald to Olbernhau near the German-Czech border. It connects Nord Stream with JAGAL (connected to the Yamal-Europe pipeline), and STEGAL (connected to the Russian gas transport route via the Czech and Slovak republics) transmission pipelines. The Gazelle pipeline, put into operation in January 2013,[55] links the OPAL pipeline with the south German gas network.

The western pipeline (NEL pipeline) runs from Greifswald to Achim, where it is connected with the Rehden-Hamburg gas pipeline.[56] Together with the MIDAL pipeline it creates the Greifswald–Bunde, Germany connection. Further gas delivery to the United Kingdom are made through the connection between Bunde and Den Helder, and from there through the offshore interconnector Balgzand–Bacton, Norfolk (BBL Pipeline).

Gazprom has also bought an abandoned mine (Hinrichshagen Structure) in Waren (Müritz), which is planned to convert into the largest underground gas storage in Europe with capacity of 5 billion cubic meters (180 billion cubic feet).[57][58]

Supply sources

The main source of natural gas for the Nord Stream pipeline is Yuzhno-Russkoye field, which is located in the Krasnoselkupsky District, Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug, Tyumen Oblast.[59][60][61] Nord Stream is also fed from fields in Yamal Peninsula, Ob-Taz bay. Gazprom has also indicated that the majority of gas produced at the Shtokman field would be sold to Europe via the Nord Stream pipeline. For this purpose, the pipeline from the Shtokman field via Kola peninsula to Volkhov or Vyborg in the Leningrad Oblast has to be built.[62]

Costs and financing

According to Gazprom, the costs of the onshore pipelines in Russia and Germany are around €6 billion.[63] The offshore section of the project is expected to cost €8.8 billion.[64] 30% of the financing was raised through equity provided by shareholders in proportion to their stakes in the project, while 70% came from external financing by banks.[65]

There are two tranches.[66][67] The first tranche for €3.9 billion includes a €3.1 billion, 16-year facility covered by export credit agencies and a €800 million, 10-year uncovered commercial loan to be serviced by earnings from the transportation contracts. A €1.6 billion loan is covered by French credit insurance company Euler Hermes, a €1 billion loan by the German United Loan Guarantee Programme UFK, and a €500 million loan by Italian Export Credit Agency SACE SpA. Loans are to be provided by 26 commercial banks. Crédit Agricole is a documentation bank and bank facility agent. Société Générale is an intercreditor agent, Sace a facility agent, security trustee and model bank. Commerzbank is the Hermes facility agent, UniCredit is the UFK facility agent, Deutsche Bank is account bank and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation is a technical and environmental bank.[65][66] The financial advisers were Société Générale, Royal Bank of Scotland (ABN Amro), Dresdner Kleinwort (Commerzbank), and Unicredit.[68][69] The legal adviser to Nord Stream was White & Case and the legal adviser for the lenders was Clifford Chance.[66]

Contractors

The environmental impact assessment was carried out by Rambøll and Environmental Resource Management. The route and seabed surveys were conducted by Marin Mätteknik, IfAÖ, PeterGaz and DOF Subsea.[70][71]

Preliminary engineering was done by Intec Engineering.[72] The design engineering of the subsea pipeline was done by Snamprogetti (now part of Saipem) and the pipeline was constructed by Saipem.[18][20] Saipem gave sub-contract to Allseas for laying more than 1/4 of both the pipelines. The seabed was prepared for the laying of the pipeline by a joint venture of Royal Boskalis Westminster and Tideway.[25] The pipes were provided by EUROPIPE, OMK, and Sumitomo.[21][23] Concrete weight coating and logistics services were provided by EUPEC PipeCoatings S.A. For the concrete weight coating new coating plants were constructed in Mukran (Germany) and Kotka (Finland).[22] Rolls-Royce plc supplied eight industrial aeroderivative gas turbines driving centrifugal compressors for front-end gas boosting at the Vyborg (Portovaya) gas compressor station.[24] Dresser Industries supplied DATUM compressors and Siirtec Nigi SPA provided a gas treatment unit for the Portovaya station.[73][74]

For the construction period, Nord Stream AG created a logistics center in Gotland. Other interim stock yards are located in Mukran, in Kotka, in Hanko (Finland) and in Karlskrona (Sweden).[22]

Project company

The Nord Stream offshore pipeline is operated by the special purpose company Nord Stream AG. Nord Stream AG was incorporated in Zug, Switzerland on 30 November 2005. Shareholders of the company are the Russian gas company Gazprom (51% of shares), German companies Wintershall and PEG Infrastruktur AG (Uniper) (both 15.5%), the Dutch gas company Gasunie (9%), and the French gas company Engie (9%).[16][26] The Managing Director of Nord Stream AG is Matthias Warnig and the chairman of the shareholders' committee is German ex-chancellor Gerhard Schröder.

Transportation contracts

On 13 October 2005 Gazprom signed a contract with German gas company Wingas, a joint venture of Gazprom and Wintershall (subsidiary of BASF), to supply 9 billion cubic meters (320 billion cubic feet) of natural gas per year for 25 years.[75] On 16 June 2006 Gazprom and Danish DONG Energy signed a 20-year contract for delivery of 1 billion cubic meters (35 billion cubic feet) Russian gas per year to Denmark, while DONG Energy will supply 600 million cubic meters (21 billion cubic feet) of natural gas per year to Gazprom's subsidiary, Gazprom Marketing and Trading, in the United Kingdom.[76] On 1 October 2009 the companies signed a contract to double the delivery to Denmark.[77]

On 29 August 2006 Gazprom and E.ON Ruhrgas signed an agreement to extend current contracts on natural gas supplies and have signed a contract for an additional 4 billion cubic meters (140 billion cubic feet) per year through the Nord Stream pipeline.[78] On 19 December 2006, Gazprom and Gaz de France (now GDF Suez) agreed to an additional 2.5 billion cubic meters of gas (88 billion cubic feet) through the Nord Stream.[79]

Expansion: Nord Stream 2

In 2011, Nord Stream AG started evaluation of an expansion project which would include two additional lines (later named Nord Stream 2 Gas Pipeline) to increase the overall annual capacity up to 110 billion cubic meters per year (3.9 trillion cubic feet per year). In August 2012, Nord Stream AG applied to the Finnish and Estonian governments for route studies in their underwater exclusive economic zones for the third and fourth lines.[80] The idea of routing the additional pipelines to the United Kingdom was considered but abandoned.[81][82] In January 2015, it was announced that the expansion project was put on hold since the existing lines were running at only half capacity due to EU restrictions on Gazprom.[83]

In June 2015, an agreement to build two additional lines was signed between Gazprom, Royal Dutch Shell, E.ON, OMV, and Engie.[84] As the creation of a joint venture was blocked by Poland, on 24 April 2017, Uniper, Wintershall, Engie, OMV and Royal Dutch Shell signed a financing agreement with Nord Stream 2 AG, a subsidiary of Gazprom responsible for the development of the Nord Stream 2 project. According to the agreement, each of five companies will provide €950 million, of which €285 million should be paid in 2017. The loan from the five companies will cover 50% of the project costs of €9.5 billion. The rest would be financed by Gazprom who remains the sole shareholder of Nord Stream 2 AG.[85] Although the pipeline has received no formal approvals from Denmark, Sweden and Finland, it is scheduled to become operational in 2019–2020.[85][86]

The route of additional lines would mainly follow the route of existing lines, except in the Russian onshore and offshore sections.[81][87] In Russia, 866 km (538 mi) of new pipeline and three compressor stations would be built, and five existing compressor stations would be expanded for feeding Nord Stream 2. Nord Stream 2 will start at the Slavyanskaya compressor station near Ust-Luga port, located 2.8 km (1.7 mi) southeast of the village of Bolshoye Kuzyomkino (Narvusi) in the Kingiseppsky District of the Leningrad Oblast, in the historical Ingria close to the Estonian border. Its landfall would be at the Kurgalsky Peninsula on the shore of Narva Bay.[87]

The president of the European Council Donald Tusk has said that Nord Stream 2 is not in the EU's interests.[88] Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi and Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán have questioned the different treatment of Nord Stream II and South Stream projects.[88][89] The project is considered to violate the long-term declared strategy of the EU to diversify its gas supplies.[90] A letter, signed by the leaders of nine EU countries, has been sent to the EC in March 2016, warning that the Nord Stream 2 project contradicts the European energy policy requirements that suppliers to the EU should not control the energy transmission assets, and that access to the energy infrastructure must be secured for non-consortium companies.[91][92] A letter by American lawmakers John McCain and Marco Rubio to the EU also criticized the project in July 2016.[93] Isabelle Kocher, chief executive officer of Engie, criticised American sanctions targeting the projects, and said they were an attempt to promote American gas in Europe.[94] Although construction has started on Nord Stream 2, the government of Denmark wants to have its foreign ministry prevent it being routed through Danish waters, and a bill is proposed to go through Parliament in October 2017, giving the foreign ministry the authority to do so. Supporters of the pipeline, including Germany, believe that unlawful deference has been made to US wishes of the project not proceeding.[95]

In January 2018, United States Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said that the U.S. and Poland "oppose" the Nord Stream 2 pipeline. They see it as undermining Europe's overall energy security and stability.[96] On January 31, 2018, Germany granted Nord Stream 2 a permit for construction and operation in German waters and landfall areas near Lubmin. [97]

Controversy

The pipeline project was criticized by some countries and environmental organizations (such as the World Wide Fund for Nature).[98][99][100][101][102] At the same time, the European Commissioner for Energy confirmed that the EU supports the project "as an additional source of gas supplies from Russia".[103]

Political aspects

Opponents have seen the pipeline as a move by Russia to bypass traditional transit countries (currently Ukraine, Slovakia, Czech Republic, Belarus and Poland).[104] Some transit countries are concerned that a long-term plan of the Kremlin is to attempt to exert political influence on them by threatening their gas supply without affecting supplies to Western Europe.[105][106] These fears are strengthened by the fact that Russia has refused to ratify the Energy Charter Treaty. Critics of Nord Stream say that Europe could become dangerously dependent on Russian natural gas, particularly since Russia could face problems meeting a surge in domestic as well as foreign demand.[107][108][109] Following several Russia–Ukraine gas disputes, as well as foreign policy towards Eastern Europe, it has been noted that the gas supplies by Russia can be used as a political tool.[110] A Swedish Defence Research Agency study, finished March 2007, counted over 55 incidents since 1991, most with "both political and economic underpinnings".[108][109] In April 2006 Radosław Sikorski, then Poland's defense minister, compared the project to the infamous 1939 Nazi-Soviet Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact. [111] In his book The New Cold War: Putin's Russia and the Threat to the West, published 2008, Edward Lucas stated that "though Nord Stream's backers insist that the project is business pure and simple, this would be easier to believe if it were more transparent."[108] In the report published by the Fridtjof Nansen Institute in 2008, Norwegian researcher Bendik Solum Whist noted that Nord Stream AG was incorporated in Switzerland, "whose strict banking secrecy laws makes the project less transparent than it would have been if based within the EU".[108] Additionally, the Russian energy sector "in general lacks transparency" and Gazprom "is no exception".[108]

The Russian response has been that the pipeline increases Europe's energy security, and that the criticism is caused by bitterness about the loss of significant transit revenues, as well as the loss of political influence that stems from the transit countries' ability to hold Russian gas supplies to Western Europe hostage to their local political agendas.[112] It would reduce Russia's dependence on the transit countries as for the first time it would link Russia directly to Western Europe.[107] According to Gazprom, the direct connection to Germany would decrease risks in the gas transit zones, including the political risk of cutting off Russian gas exports to Western Europe.[113]

An anti-trust investigation against Gazprom started in 2011 revealed a number of "abusive practices" the company applied against various recipients in EU and Nord Stream 2 was criticized from this angle as strengthening Gazprom's position in EU even more and European Commission officials expressed the view that "Nord Stream 2 does not enhance EU energy security".[114]

Security and military aspects

Swedish military experts and several politicians, including former Minister for Defence Mikael Odenberg, have stated that the pipeline can cause a security policy problem for Sweden.[115] According to Odenberg, the pipeline increases the Russian naval presence in the Swedish economic zone and the Russians can use this for military intelligence should they want to.[116] Finnish military scholar Alpo Juntunen has said that even though the political discussion over Nord Stream in Finland concentrates on the various ecological aspects, there are clearly military implications to the pipeline that are not discussed openly in Finland.[117] More political concerns were raised when Vladimir Putin stated that the ecological safety of the pipeline project will be ensured by using the Baltic Fleet of the Russian Navy.[118] German weekly Stern has reported that the fibre optic cable and repeater stations along the pipeline could theoretically also be used for espionage. Nord Stream AG asserted that a fibre-optic control cable was neither necessary nor technically planned.[119]

Deputy Chairman of the Board of Executive Directors of Gazprom Alexander Medvedev has dismissed these concerns, stating that "some objections are put forward that are laughable—political, military or linked to spying. That is really surprising because in the modern world ... it is laughable to say a gas pipeline is a weapon in a spy war."[120]

German Bundeswehr asked Nord Stream to change the planned route because the pipeline is laid close to a sea testing ground near Rügen, which is actively used for naval exercises.[121]

Economic aspects

Russian and German officials have claimed that the pipeline leads to economic savings due to the elimination of transit fees (as transit countries would be bypassed), and a higher operating pressure of the offshore pipeline which leads to lower operating costs (by eliminating the necessity for expensive midway compressor stations).[122] According to Ukrtransgaz, the Ukrainian gas transportation system operator, Ukraine alone will lose natural gas transit revenues up to $720 million per year.[123] Gazprom has stated that it will divert 20 billion cubic meters of natural gas transported through Ukraine to Nord Stream.[124]

Opponents say that the maintenance costs of a submarine pipeline are higher than for an overland route. In 1998, former Gazprom chairman Rem Vyakhirev claimed that the project was economically unfeasible.[125]

As the Nord Stream pipeline crosses the waterway to Polish ports in Szczecin and Świnoujście, there were concerns that it will reduce the depth of the waterway leading to the ports.[126][127][128] However, Polish prime minister Donald Tusk and several experts have confirmed that the Nord Stream pipeline does not block the development plans of Świnoujście and Szczecin ports.[128][129]

Environmental aspects

Environmentalists and several governments expressed concern that construction on the ocean floor would disturb and dislodge World War II-era materials including mines, chemical waste, chemical munitions and other items dumped in the Baltic Sea in the past decades, and thereby toxic substances could surface from the seabed damaging the Baltic's particularly sensitive ecosystem.[130][131][132][133] Swedish Environment Minister Andreas Carlgren demanded that the environmental analysis should include alternative ways of taking the pipeline across the Baltic, as the pipeline is projected to be passing through areas considered environmentally problematic and risky.[134] Sweden's three opposition parties called for an examination of the possibility of rerouting the pipeline onto dry land.[133] Finnish environmental groups campaigned to consider the more southern route, claiming that the sea bed is flatter and so construction would be more straightforward, and therefore potentially less disruptive to waste, including dioxins and dioxin-like compounds, littered on the sea bed.[135] Latvian president Valdis Zatlers said that Nord Stream was environmentally hazardous as, unlike the North Sea, there is no such water circulation in the Baltic Sea.[136] Ene Ergma, Speaker of the Riigikogu (Parliament of Estonia), warned that the pipeline work rips a canal in the seabed which will demand leveling the sand that lies along the way, atomizing volcanic formations and disposing of fill along the bottom of the sea, altering sea currents.[137]

The impact on bird and marine life in the Baltic Sea is also a concern, as the Baltic sea is recognized by the International Maritime Organization as a particularly sensitive sea area. The World Wide Fund for Nature requested that countries party to the Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission (HELCOM) safeguard the Baltic marine habitats, which could be altered by the implementation of the Nord Stream project.[101] Its Finnish branch said it might file a court case against Nord Stream AG if the company did not properly assess a potential alternative route on the southern side of Hogland. According to Nord Stream AG, this was not a suitable route for the pipeline because of the planned conservation area near Hogland, subsea cables, and a main shipping route.[100] Russian environmental organizations warned that the ecosystem in the Eastern part of the Gulf of Finland is the most vulnerable part of the Baltic Sea and assumed damage to the island territory of the planned Ingermanland nature preserve as a result of laying the pipeline.[137] Swedish environmental groups are concerned that the pipeline is planned to pass too closely to the border of the marine reserve near Gotland.[138] Also Greenpeace is concerned that the pipeline would pass through several sites designated marine conservation areas.[139]

In April 2007, the Young Conservative League (YCL) of Lithuania started an online petition entitled "Protect the Baltic Sea While It’s Still Not Too Late!", translated into all state languages of the countries of the Baltic region.[140] On 29 January 2008 the Petitions Committee of the European Parliament organized a public hearing on a petition introduced by the leader of YCL – Radvile Morkunaite. On 8 July 2008, the European Parliament endorsed by 542 votes to 60 a non-binding report calling on the European Commission to evaluate the additional impact on the Baltic Sea caused by the Nord Stream project.[141] The Riigikogu made a declaration on 27 October 2009, expressing "concern over the possible environmental impacts of the gas line" and emphasizing that international conventions have deemed "the Baltic Sea in an especially vulnerable environmental status".[102]

Russian officials described these concerns as far-fetched and politically motivated by opponents of the project. They argued that during the construction the seabed will be cleaned, rather than endangered. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has claimed that Russia fully respects the desire to provide for the 100% environmental sustainability of the project and that Russia is fully supportive of such an approach, and that all environmental concerns would be addressed in the process of environmental impact assessment.[142]

Concerns were raised that Nord Stream AG planned on rinsing out the pipeline with 2.3 billion liters of a solution containing glutaraldehyde, pumped afterward into the Baltic Sea. Nord Stream AG responded that glutaraldehyde would not be used, and even had the chemical been used, the effects would have been brief and localized due to the speed with which the chemical breaks down once it comes in contact with water.[143]

Another area of concern was that the Baltic Sea and particularly the Gulf of Finland were heavily mined during World War I and II, with many mines still in the sea.[139] According to Marin Mätteknik around 85,000 mines were laid during the First and Second World Wars, of which only half have been recovered. A lot of munitions have also been dumped in this sea.[144] Critics of the pipeline voiced fears that the pipeline would disturb ammunition dumps. In November 2008 it was reported that the pipeline will run through old sea mine defense lines and that the Gulf of Finland is considered one of the most heavily mined sea areas in the world.[145] Sunken mines, which have been found on the pipeline route, lay primarily in international waters at a depth of more than 70 m (230 ft). Nord Stream AG detonated the mines underwater.[145]

Ethical issues

The former Chancellor of Germany, Gerhard Schröder, and the President of Russia, Vladimir Putin, were strong advocates of the pipeline project during the negotiation phase. International media alluded to a past relationship between the Managing Director of Nord Stream AG, Matthias Warnig, himself a former Stasi officer, and Vladimir Putin when he was a KGB agent in East Germany.[146][147][148][149] These allegations were denied by Matthias Warning, who said that he had met Vladimir Putin for the first time in his life in 1991, when Putin was the head of the Committee for External Relations of the Saint Petersburg Mayor's Office.[149][150]

The agreement to build the pipeline was signed ten days before the 2005 German parliamentary election. On 24 October 2005, a few weeks before Schröder had stepped down as Chancellor, the German government guaranteed to cover €1 billion of the Nord Stream project cost, should Gazprom default on a loan. However, this guarantee expired at the end of 2006 without ever having been needed.[151] Soon after leaving the post of Chancellor of Germany, Gerhard Schröder agreed to head the shareholders' committee of Nord Stream AG. This has been widely described by German and international media as a conflict of interest,[152][153][154] the implication being that the pipeline project may have been pushed through for personal gain rather than for improving gas supplies to Germany. Information about the German government's guarantee was requested by the European Commission. No formal charges have been filed against any party despite years of exhaustive investigations.[151]

In February 2009, the Swedish prosecutor's office started an investigation based on suspicions of bribery and corruption after a college on the island of Gotland received a donation from Nord Stream. The 5 million Swedish kronor (US$574,000) donation was directed to a professor at Gotland University College who had previously warned that the Nord Stream pipeline would come too close to a sensitive bird zone.[155] The consortium has hired several former high-ranking officials, such as Ulrica Schenström, former undersecretary at the Swedish Prime Minister's office, and Dan Svanell, former press secretary for several politicians in the Swedish Social Democratic Party.[156] In addition, the former Prime Minister of Finland, Paavo Lipponen, had worked for Nord Stream as an adviser since 2008.[157]

Land-based alternatives

On 11 January 2007, the Ministry of Trade and Industry of Finland made a statement on the environmental impact assessment programme of the Russia-Germany natural gas pipeline, in which it mentioned that alternative routes via the Baltic states, Kaliningrad and/or Poland might theoretically be shorter than the route across the Baltic Sea, would be easier to flexibly increase the capacity of the pipeline, and might have better financial results.[158] There were also calls from Sweden to consider rerouting the pipeline onto dry land.[133] Poland had proposed the construction of a second line of the Yamal–Europe pipeline, as well as the Amber pipeline through the Baltic states and Poland as land-based alternatives to the offshore pipeline. The Amber project foresees laying a natural gas pipeline across the Tver Oblast, Novgorod and Pskov oblasts in Russia and then through Latvia and Lithuania to Poland, where it would be reconnected to the Yamal–Europe pipeline.[11] Latvia has proposed using its underground gas storage facilities if the onshore route were to be used.[136] Proponents have claimed that the Amber pipeline would cost half as much as an underwater pipeline, would be shorter, and would have less environmental impact.[159] Critics of this proposal say that in this case it would be more expensive for the suppliers over the long-term because the main aim of the project is to reduce transit costs.[160] Nord Stream AG has responded that the Baltic Sea would be the only route for the pipeline and it will not consider an overland alternative.[161]

World War II graves

A former member of the European Parliament from Estonia, Andres Tarand has raised the issue that the Nord Stream pipeline could disturb World War II graves dating from naval battles in 1941. A Nord Stream spokesman has stated that only one sunken ship is in the vicinity of the planned pipeline and added that it would not be disturbed.[162] However, on 16 July 2008 it was announced that one of DOF Subsea's seismic vessels had discovered during a survey for the planned Nord Stream pipeline, in Finland's exclusive economic zone in the Gulf of Finland, the wreck of a submarine with Soviet markings, believed to have sunk during World War II.[70]

In addition to the wreck of the Soviet submarine, there are sunken ships on the route of Nord Stream in the Bay of Greifswald and in the Gulf of Finland. The ship in the Bay of Greifswald is one of 20 sunk in 1715 by the Swedish navy to create a physical barrier across the shallow entrance to the Bay of Greifswald coastal lagoon.[163] Russian archaeologists claimed that the ship in the Gulf of Finland "was probably built in 1710 and sank during a raid aimed at conquering Finland" in 1713 during Peter the Great's reign.[164]

Articles and resources

References

  1. Nord Stream, Wikipedia, accessed April 2018
  2. Natural Gas Pipelines in Europe, Asia, Africa & Middle East, Harvard University, accessed January 2020.
  3. "Energy Base," Accessed September 16, 2020
  4. 4.0 4.1 "Controversial Project Launched: Merkel and Medvedev Open Baltic Gas Pipeline". Spiegel Online. 8 November 2011. Retrieved 8 November 2011.
  5. 5.0 5.1 Wiesmann, Gerrit (8 November 2011). "Russia-EU gas pipeline delivers first supplies". Financial Times. Retrieved 8 November 2011.
  6. "Nord Stream Passes Ships and Bombs". The Moscow Times. Bloomberg. 5 May 2011. Retrieved 10 September 2011.
  7. 7.0 7.1 Gloystein, Henning (4 May 2011). "Nord Stream to finish 1st gas pipeline Thursday". Reuters. Retrieved 26 May 2010.
  8. Zhdannikov, Dmitry; Pinchuk, Denis (12 December 2008). "Russia's Gazprom to expand Nord Stream gas pipeline with E.ON, Shell, OMV". Reuters. Archived from the original on 19 June 2015. Retrieved 19 June 2015. Cite uses deprecated parameter |deadurl= (help)
  9. Pinchuk, Denis (28 January 2015). "Gazprom mothballs extension of Nord Stream pipeline". Reuters. Archived from the original on 19 June 2015. Retrieved 19 June 2015. Cite uses deprecated parameter |deadurl= (help)
  10. 10.0 10.1 Fortum (18 May 2005). "Fortum sells its stake in North Transgas to Gazprom". Press release. Retrieved on 15 February 2008.
  11. 11.0 11.1 "Project Information Document — Offshore pipeline through the Baltic Sea" (PDF). Nord Stream AG. November 2006. Retrieved 14 May 2012. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  12. "Pipeline Report" (PDF). Scientific Surveys. June 2001. Retrieved 31 January 2009.
  13. "Gazprom takes control of North Transgas". Upstream Online. NHST Media Group. 18 May 2005. Retrieved 31 January 2009.
  14. "Nord Stream: Historical Background". Gazprom. Archived from the original on 28 September 2007. Retrieved 3 August 2007. Cite uses deprecated parameter |deadurl= (help)
  15. Ликвидировано 100-процентное дочернее предприятие "Газпрома" в Финляндии [Gazprom's 100% owned daughter company in Finland is dissolved] (in Russian). RusEnergy. 30 January 2007. Retrieved 15 February 2008.CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
  16. 16.0 16.1 16.2 16.3 "Nord Stream. Facts & Figures". Nord Stream AG. Archived from the original on 4 January 2011. Retrieved 6 April 2007. Cite uses deprecated parameter |deadurl= (help)
  17. Nord Stream AG (9 March 2009). "Start of Public Participation throughout Baltic Sea Region on Nord Stream Pipeline Project". Press release. Retrieved on 26 April 2016.
  18. 18.0 18.1 "Leading engineering company to prepare detailed design" (PDF). Nord Stream Facts. Nord Stream AG (1). April 2007. Retrieved 17 November 2008.
  19. "Saipem bags Nord Stream work". Upstream Online. NHST Media Group. 17 September 2007. Retrieved 30 September 2007.
  20. 20.0 20.1 Simpson, Ian (24 June 2008). "Saipem wins 1 bln euro Nord Stream contract". Reuters. Retrieved 11 July 2008.
  21. 21.0 21.1 Wintershall (25 September 2007). "Nord Stream decided on Pipe Tender". Press release. Retrieved on 30 September 2007.
  22. 22.0 22.1 22.2 "Sustainable Investment in Logistics around the Baltic Region". Rigzone. 18 February 2008. Retrieved 19 February 2008.
  23. 23.0 23.1 Soldatkin, Vladimir (23 January 2010). "Nord Stream awards 1 bln euros tender for gas link". Reuters. Retrieved 18 February 2010.
  24. 24.0 24.1 "Gazprom Awards Compressor Contract for Nord Stream Pipeline to Rolls-Royce". Downstream Today. 30 December 2008. Retrieved 11 January 2009.
  25. 25.0 25.1 "Boskalis Wins Nord Stream, Saudi Contracts". Downstream Today. Agence France-Presse. 9 January 2009. Retrieved 5 May 2011.
  26. 26.0 26.1 26.2 Kim, Lucian; Walters, Greg (6 November 2007). "Gazprom Picks Dutch Company for Northern Gas Pipeline". Bloomberg. Archived from the original on 26 April 2016. Retrieved 26 April 2016. Cite uses deprecated parameter |deadurl= (help)
  27. "Gasunie joins Nord Stream as shareholder". RBC. 20 June 2008. Retrieved 23 June 2008.
  28. Boselli, Muriel (1 March 2010). "GDF Suez, Gazprom sign Nord Stream pipeline deal". Reuters. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
  29. "GDF Suez SA has received 9% in Nord Stream". Rusmergers. 11 August 2010. Retrieved 26 May 2011.
  30. "Nord Stream Consortium Hires Former Finnish Premier". Downstream Today. Deutsche Presse-Agentur. 15 August 2008. Retrieved 19 August 2008.
  31. "Swedish Govt Receives Baltic Pipeline Plans". Downstream Today. Deutsche Presse-Agentur. 21 December 2007. Retrieved 26 December 2007.
  32. Ringstrom, Anna (12 February 2008). "Sweden says application for Baltic pipeline incomplete". Reuters. Retrieved 15 February 2008.
  33. "Sweden unimpressed by Baltic pipeline proposal". The Local. 12 February 2008. Retrieved 15 February 2008.
  34. "Nord Stream gas pipeline gets Danish clearance". Reuters. 20 October 2009. Retrieved 1 November 2009.
  35. Johnson, Simon; Lamppu, Eva; Korsunskaya, Darya; Wasilewski, Patryk; Baczynska, Gabriela (5 November 2009). "Nord Stream pipeline gets nod from Sweden, Finland". Reuters. Retrieved 7 November 2009.
  36. "Nord Stream Wins Final Clearance". The Moscow Times. 15 February 2010. Retrieved 17 February 2010.
  37. Young, Brett; Kinnunen, Terhi (12 February 2010). "Nord Stream cleared to start construction in April". Reuters. Retrieved 18 February 2010.
  38. "Gazprom starts Nord Stream launch point". Upi. 15 January 2010. Retrieved 19 January 2010.
  39. Gazprom (15 January 2010). "Gazprom launches Portovaya compressor station construction". Press release. Retrieved on 19 January 2010.
  40. Smith, Christopher E. (8 September 2011). "Nord Stream natural gas pipeline begins line fill". Oil & Gas Journal. PennWell Corporation. Retrieved 10 September 2011.
  41. Vorobyova, Toni (9 April 2010). "Russia starts Nord Stream Europe gas route project". Reuters. Retrieved 10 April 2010.
  42. "Nord Stream completes underwater work on gas pipeline". RIA Novosti. 21 June 2011. Retrieved 6 September 2010.
  43. Blau, John (26 August 2011). "Nord Stream pipeline now connected to German link". Deutsche Welle. Retrieved 10 September 2011.
  44. "First gas for Nord Stream". Upstream Online. NHST Media Group. 6 September 2011. Retrieved 6 September 2011.
  45. Hromadko, Jan; Harriet, Torry (8 November 2011). "Pipeline Opening Highlights Russian Energy Role". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 8 November 2011.
  46. "Nord Stream Is Giving Europe Gas". The Moscow Times. 8 November 2011. Retrieved 8 November 2011.
  47. "Gazprom Completes Nord Stream's 2nd Pipeline". RIA Novosti. 29 August 2012. Retrieved 15 September 2012.
  48. "Nord Stream Second Leg to Be Launched on Oct. 8". RIA Novosti. 11 September 2012. Retrieved 15 September 2012.
  49. Paszyc, Ewa (10 October 2012). "Russia: Gazprom has activated Nord Stream's second pipeline". EastWeek. Centre for Eastern Studies. Retrieved 9 December 2012.
  50. 50.0 50.1 "Nord Stream Gas Pipeline". Gazprom. Archived from the original on 8 July 2007. Retrieved 3 August 2007. Cite uses deprecated parameter |deadurl= (help)
  51. "Answers to questions asked by representatives of non-governmental organizations on the EIA procedure for the Nord Stream Project" (PDF). Nord Stream AG. 20 October 2007. Retrieved 15 February 2008.
  52. "Finland to get Shtokman gas via the Nord Stream". Barents Observer. 11 December 2006. Archived from the original on 24 July 2011. Retrieved 2 August 2007. Cite uses deprecated parameter |deadurl= (help)
  53. "Nord Stream Espoo Report. Chapter 4: Description of the Project" (PDF). Nord Stream AG. 2009: 106. Archived from the original on 19 June 2015. Retrieved 19 June 2015. Cite uses deprecated parameter |deadurl= (help); Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  54. "Nord Stream seeks to study Estonian economic zone in Baltic until 2015". Kyiv Post. Interfax-Ukraine. 27 August 2012. Retrieved 15 September 2012.
  55. Czech Nord Stream natural gas link Gazela flowing at full capacity, ICIS 24 Apr 2013 retrieved 28 April 2013
  56. "Wingas plans Nord Stream double". Upstream Online. NHST Media Group. 27 March 2007. Retrieved 3 August 2007.
  57. "Gazprom Plans Underground Storage Near Berlin". Downstream Today. Deutsche Presse-Agentur. 27 November 2007. Retrieved 29 November 2007.
  58. "Gazprom plant Europas größtes Erdgaslager" [Gazprom plans European largest gas storage]. Welt Online (in German). 28 November 2007. Retrieved 29 November 2007.CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
  59. Philippa Runner (21 January 2009). "Nord Stream to pump EU gas by 2011, Russia says". EUobserver. Retrieved 10 October 2009.
  60. Elena Zhuk (January 2008). "Gazprom and BASF Start Joint Production at Yuzhno-Russkoye Gas Field". Oil & Gas Eurasia. Eurasia Press, Inc. Retrieved 10 October 2009.
  61. "Gas for Europe". Nord Stream AG. Archived from the original on 8 October 2009. Retrieved 10 October 2009. Cite uses deprecated parameter |deadurl= (help)
  62. Jorn Madslien (9 October 2006). "Shock as Russia goes solo on gas field". BBC News. Retrieved 3 August 2007.
  63. Dempsey, Judy (23 August 2007). "Gazprom plans to re-route controversial European pipeline". The New York Times. Retrieved 10 September 2011.
  64. "Nord Stream more expensive". Barents Observer. 17 March 2010. Retrieved 18 March 2010.
  65. 65.0 65.1 Mangham, Christopher (21 October 2009). "RLPC-Nord Stream project financing signing — sources". Reuters. Retrieved 1 November 2009.
  66. 66.0 66.1 66.2 Gazprom (16 March 2010). "Nord Stream completes Phase I financing". Press release. Retrieved on 18 March 2010.
  67. Leftly, Mark (29 March 2009). "Gazprom in Nord Stream windfall". The Independent. London. Retrieved 19 April 2009.
  68. Bowman, Louise (14 April 2009). "Nord Stream looks for flows in funding pipeline". Euromoney. Retrieved 19 April 2009.
  69. Reilly, Alasdair; Mangham, Christopher (21 October 2009). "RLPC-Nord Stream project financing nears agreement-sources". Reuters. Retrieved 1 November 2009.
  70. 70.0 70.1 "Nord Stream survey finds Soviet sub". Upstream Online. NHST Media Group. 17 July 2008. Retrieved 18 July 2008.
  71. Wintershall (21 October 2008). "Nord Stream Project Well On Track". Press release. Retrieved on 17 November 2008.
  72. Clark, Judy; Rach, Nina (10 October 2006). "Gazprom to develop Shtokman alone, pipe gas to Europe". Oil & Gas Journal. PennWell Corporation. Retrieved 31 January 2009.
  73. "Dresser-Rand bags $200m in contracts". Upstream Online. NHST Media Group. 13 January 2009. Retrieved 31 January 2009.
  74. Izundu, Uchenna (5 March 2009). "Nord Stream lets gas treatment unit". Oil & Gas Journal. PennWell Corporation. Retrieved 19 April 2009.
  75. Wingas (13 October 2005). "Gazexport and WINGAS agree upon first deliveries of natural gas through the Northern European Gas Pipeline". Press release. Retrieved on 16 February 2008.
  76. DONG Energy (19 June 2006). "Gazprom to deliver gas to Denmark via North European Gas Pipeline" (PDF). Press release. Retrieved on 16 December 2007.
  77. Peter Levring (1 October 2009). "Dong Energy says to double Gazprom gas deliveries from 2012". Reuters. Retrieved 7 November 2009.
  78. Gazprom (29 August 2006). "Gazprom and E.ON prolong the existing contracts and sign contract for gas sypply via the NEGP". Press release. Retrieved on 18 May 2008.
  79. "Gaz de France and Gazprom Extend Their Natural Gas Supply Agreements until 2030". Oil Voice. 19 December 2006. Retrieved 16 December 2007.
  80. "Nord Stream seeks to study Estonian economic zone in Baltic until 2015". Kyiv Post. Interfax-Ukraine. 27 August 2012. Retrieved 15 September 2012.
  81. 81.0 81.1 Nord Stream AG (2013). "Nord Stream Extension Project Information Document (PID)" (PDF). Ministry of the Environment of Estonia: 18. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 June 2015. Retrieved 19 June 2015. Cite uses deprecated parameter |deadurl= (help); Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  82. Loukashov, Dmitry (12 December 2008). "Nord Stream: is the UK extension good for Gazprom?". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 19 June 2015. Retrieved 19 June 2015. Cite uses deprecated parameter |deadurl= (help)
  83. Pinchuk, Denis (28 January 2015). "Gazprom mothballs extension of Nord Stream pipeline". Reuters. Archived from the original on 19 June 2015. Retrieved 19 June 2015. Cite uses deprecated parameter |deadurl= (help)
  84. Zhdannikov, Dmitry; Pinchuk, Denis (12 December 2008). "Exclusive: Gazprom building global alliance with expanded Shell". Reuters. Archived from the original on 19 June 2015. Retrieved 19 June 2015. Cite uses deprecated parameter |deadurl= (help)
  85. 85.0 85.1 Foy, Henry; Toplensky, Rochelle; Ward, Andrew (24 April 2017). "Gazprom to receive funding for Nord Stream 2 pipeline". Financial Times. Retrieved 30 April 2017.
  86. "Nord Stream 2 financing takes shape". Deutsche Welle. 24 April 2017. Retrieved 30 April 2017.
  87. 87.0 87.1 Ramboll, Nord Stream AG (April 2017). "Espoo Report. Nord Stream 2" (PDF). Ministry of the Environment of Estonia: 79–80, 523. Retrieved 3 May 2017. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  88. 88.0 88.1 Teffer, Peter (18 December 2015). "Tusk: Nord Stream II doesn't help". EUobserver. Retrieved 5 June 2016.
  89. Steinhauser, Gabriele (18 December 2015). "Germany's Merkel Defends Russian Gas Pipeline Plan". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 5 June 2016.
  90. "Nord Stream 2: Trojan Horse or Guarantee of Security". Natural Gas Europe. 23 March 2016. Retrieved 30 April 2017.
  91. Sytas, Andrius (16 March 2016). "EU leaders sign letter objecting to Nord Stream-2 gas link". Reuters. Retrieved 30 April 2017.
  92. Rettman, Andrew (17 March 2016). "Eastern EU leaders to warn Juncker on Nord Stream II". EUobserver. Retrieved 30 April 2017.
  93. "United States is attacking Russia's gas projects in Europe". Eurasia Daily. 14 July 2016. Retrieved 30 April 2017.
  94. Mazneva, Elena; Donahue, Patrick; Shiryaevskaya, Anna (15 June 2017). "Germany, Austria Tell U.S. Not to Interfere in EU Energy". Bloomberg Markets. Bloomberg. Archived from the original on 15 June 2017. Retrieved 30 September 2017. Cite uses deprecated parameter |deadurl= (help)
  95. 02.09.2017. "Media: the Danish authorities intend to "push" the law against the "Nord stream-2" | The Newspapers". Retrieved 2017-09-03.
  96. "U.S.'s Tillerson Says Nord Stream 2 Pipeline Would Undermine Europe's Energy Security". Reuters. U.S. News & World Report. Retrieved 27 January 2018.
  97. "Germany grants permit for Nord Stream 2 Russian gas pipeline". Reuters. U.S. News & World Report. Retrieved 14 February 2018.
  98. Kotlowski, Aleksander (9 June 2009). "Russian Energy Strategy and Transit Routes in Eastern Europe — A View from Warsaw". Oil, Gas & Energy Law Intelligence (requires subscription). MARIS B.V. 7 (2 (special issue on 'EU&nbsp, – Russia relations')). Retrieved 9 June 2009.
  99. Schmid, Fidelius; Proissl, Wolfgang (29 October 2006). "US criticises Russia-Germany gas deal". Financial Times. Retrieved 2 August 2007.
  100. 100.0 100.1 Kinnunen, Terhi (15 January 2008). "Finnish court actions could delay Baltic gas link". Reuters. Retrieved 31 January 2008.
  101. 101.0 101.1 "Risk Assessment and an Environmental Impact Assessment for the North European Gas Pipeline Project (NEGP)" (PDF). HELCOM. 3 October 2005. Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 June 2016. Retrieved 5 June 2016. Cite uses deprecated parameter |deadurl= (help); Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  102. 102.0 102.1 Riigikogu avaldus. Läänemerre kavandatava gaasijuhtmega seotud keskkonnariskidest Declaration of the Riigikogu. On environmental hazards connected with the gas line planned into the Baltic Sea. In Estonian. The Riigikogu 27 October 2009
  103. Crawford, David; Catan, Thomas (13 November 2008). "Putin Threatens to Scrap Gas Pipeline as Talks With EU Leaders Approach". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 14 November 2008.
  104. Cohen, Ariel (26 October 2006). "The North European Gas Pipeline Threatens Europe's Energy Security" (PDF). Heritage Foundation. Retrieved 4 October 2010. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  105. "New Twists and Turns in German-Russian Gas Pipeline Saga". Deutsche Welle. 13 July 2007. Retrieved 3 August 2007.
  106. "Delays hit Nord Stream plans". Upstream Online. NHST Media Group. 6 November 2007. Retrieved 10 November 2007.
  107. 107.0 107.1 Dempsey, Judy (6 May 2008). "Gas pipeline under the Baltic faces many hurdles". The New York Times. Retrieved 18 May 2008.
  108. 108.0 108.1 108.2 108.3 108.4 Solum Whist, Bendik (November 2008). "Nord Stream: Not Just a Pipeline" (PDF). Fridtjof Nansen Institute. Retrieved 7 November 2009. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  109. 109.0 109.1 Larsson, Robert L. (March 2007). "Nord Stream, Sweden and Baltic Sea Security" (PDF). Swedish Defence Research Agency. Retrieved 7 November 2009. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  110. Boyes, Roger (7 January 2009). "Gazprom is not a market player, it's a political weapon". The Times. London. Retrieved 7 January 2009.
  111. "Polish Defense Minister's Pipeline Remark Angers Germany". Voice of America Online. 3 May 2006. Retrieved 4 October 2010.
  112. "Baltic deal worries Polish press". BBC News. 8 September 2005. Retrieved 18 March 2008.
  113. "Gazprom—Strategy for the Energy Sector Leadership. Speech by Alexey Miller at the Gazprom's annual general shareholders' meeting". Gazprom. 30 June 2006. Archived from the original on 28 September 2007. Retrieved 2 August 2007. Cite uses deprecated parameter |deadurl= (help)
  114. "EU documents lay bare Russian energy abuse". Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  115. Bakst, Alex (15 November 2006). "Baltic Sea Pipeline: Sweden Afraid of Russian Spooks". Spiegel Online. Retrieved 18 May 2008.
  116. "Rysk gasledning säkerhetspolitiskt problem (Russian gas pipeline is a security problem)" (in Swedish). Dagens Nyheter. 14 November 2006. Retrieved 2 August 2007.CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
  117. "Soome dotsent: Nord Streamil on sõjaline tähendus" [Nord Stream has military implications]. Postimees (in Estonian). 10 January 2009. Retrieved 10 January 2009.CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
  118. "Russian navy to ensure Nord Stream ecology—Putin". Interfax. 25 October 2006. Retrieved 2 August 2007.
  119. Tillack, Hans-Martin (13 February 2008). "Schröders Pipeline. Spionagekanal in der Ostsee? (Schröder's pipeline. Espionage channel in the Baltic Sea?)". Stern (in German). Retrieved 18 May 2008.CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
  120. "Gazprom seeking Shtokman partners". Upstream Online. NHST Media Group. 28 July 2007. Retrieved 2 August 2007.
  121. "German military asks for change to Nord Stream route — paper". RIA Novosti. 10 June 2009. Retrieved 10 June 2009.
  122. "Nord Stream. Questions and Answers. Economic and Financial aspects". Nord Stream AG. 1 February 2007. Retrieved 6 April 2007.
  123. "Nord Stream costs Ukraine $720 million". United Press International. 20 May 2011. Retrieved 26 May 2011.
  124. Bachman, Jessica (25 May 2011). "Russia to divert 20 bcm of gas from Ukraine to Nord Stream". Reuters. Retrieved 26 May 2011.
  125. Grib, Natalya (12 July 2007). "Plus Gasification of Entire Europe". Kommersant. Retrieved 26 August 2007.
  126. "A Terminal Disagreement Between Poland and Germany". 7 September 2010. Retrieved 6 September 2011.
  127. Sobczyk, Marcin (25 January 2010). "Poland Sits Still as Nord Stream Prepares to Block Sea Port". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 6 September 2011.
  128. 128.0 128.1 Melck, Brendan (16 May 2011). "Squeezed by Nord Stream". Warsaw Business Journal. Retrieved 6 September 2011.
  129. "Poland: PM Says Nord Stream Will Not Block Development of Polish Ports". LNG World News. 22 June 2011. Retrieved 6 September 2011.
  130. "Final Report of the ad hoc Working Group on Dumped Chemical Munition (HELCOM CHEMU) to the 16th Meeting of the Helsinki Commission" (PDF). HELCOM. March 1995. Retrieved 2 August 2007.
  131. "Tons of Mercury Found in the Baltic Sea. Europe's Underwater Chemical Dump". Spiegel Online. 30 August 2006. Retrieved 2 August 2007.
  132. McGroarty, Patrick (2 January 2008). "Bad News Blooms in the Baltic: Can a New Cleanup Plan Save the Sea". Spiegel Online. Retrieved 18 May 2008.
  133. 133.0 133.1 133.2 "Gazprom Standing By Nord Stream Plans". Downstream Today. United Press International. 27 November 2007. Retrieved 28 November 2007.
  134. "Nord Stream hits Swedish hurdle". Upstream Online. NHST Media Group. 31 October 2007. Retrieved 10 November 2007.
  135. Terhi Kinnunen (21 January 2008). "Finland tells Nord Stream to study alternative routes". Reuters. Retrieved 31 January 2008.
  136. 136.0 136.1 "Latvia set to propose alternative to Nord Stream". RIA Novosti. 17 April 2009. Retrieved 19 April 2009.
  137. 137.0 137.1 Galina Raguzina (2 November 2007). "While Nord Stream embraces Russia, Estonia will not embrace Nord Stream". Bellona. Retrieved 9 August 2008.
  138. Schäfer, Torsten (17 February 2007). "Baltic Sea Gas Pipeline Meets European Resistance". Deutsche Welle. Retrieved 2 August 2007.
  139. 139.0 139.1 Hotten, Russell (21 February 2008). "What's in the pipeline for Nord Stream?". The Daily Telegraph. London. Retrieved 9 August 2008.
  140. Galina Raguzina (1 June 2007). "Nord Stream gas pipeline a danger for the Baltic ecology". Bellona. Retrieved 10 November 2007.
  141. Pete Harrison (8 July 2008). "EU lawmakers demand probe of Baltic gas pipeline". Reuters. Retrieved 11 July 2008.
  142. "Russia backs green Nord Stream". Upstream Online. NHST Media Group. 13 June 2007. Retrieved 2 August 2007.
  143. "Baltic Sea Pipeline Keeps Losing Friends". Bloomberg Businessweek. Bloomberg. 25 February 2008. Retrieved 18 May 2008.
  144. "ROV survey tool searches for mines along Baltic pipeline". Offshore. PennWell Corporation. 68 (3). 1 March 2008. Retrieved 4 October 2010.
  145. 145.0 145.1 "Wartime Mines To Be Cleared from Nord Stream Route". Helsingin Sanomat. Downstream Today. 29 November 2008. Retrieved 11 January 2009.
  146. "My President Went to Bratislava and All I Got Was This Lousy T-Shirt". Spiegel Online. 24 February 2005. Retrieved 31 January 2009.
  147. Vinocur, John (3 January 2006). "For Schröder and Putin, Linkup No Coincidence". New York Times. Retrieved 31 January 2009.
  148. Parfitt, Tom (27 February 2005). "Putin's Enemies Call for Investigation into Links with Stasi Agent". The Daily Telegraph. London. Retrieved 31 January 2009.
  149. 149.0 149.1 "Report Links Putin to Dresdner". The St. Petersburg Times. 1 March 2005. Retrieved 31 January 2009.
  150. "In Russland braucht man einen langen Atem" [In Russia You Need a Lot of Patience]. Welt am Sonntag (in German). 17 January 2007. Archived from the original on 5 May 2014. Retrieved 26 April 2016. Cite uses deprecated parameter |deadurl= (help)CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
  151. 151.0 151.1 Buck, Tobias; Benoit, Bertrand (8 May 2006). "EU to Probe German Gas Pipeline Guarantee". Financial Times. Retrieved 26 August 2007.
  152. Young, Marc (12 December 2005). "Schröder to Build Putin's Pipeline". Spiegel Online. Retrieved 26 August 2007.
  153. "Schröder's New Job Stinks". Spiegel Online. 13 December 2005. Retrieved 26 August 2007.
  154. "Gerhard Schroeder's Sellout". The Washington Post. 13 December 2005. Retrieved 26 August 2007.
  155. "Nord Stream Gift Prompts Bribery Probe". The Local. 19 February 2009. Retrieved 19 April 2009.
  156. Ullman, Tommie (16 February 2009). "Former Political Employees Now on Other Side in the Hot 'Pipe Line Question'". Stockholm News. Retrieved 19 April 2009.
  157. "Ex-PM Paavo Lipponen to Serve as Adviser to Gas Pipeline Builder". Helsingin Sanomat. 15 August 2008. Retrieved 19 April 2009.
  158. Ministry of Trade and Industry of Finland (11 January 2007). "Statement on the environmental impact assessment progamme of the Russia-Germany natural gas pipeline" (PDF). Nord Stream AG. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 March 2009. Retrieved 23 February 2008. Cite uses deprecated parameter |deadurl= (help); Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  159. "Poland has its own project of gas pipeline to deliver Russian gas to Western Europe". Gazeta.kz. 30 January 2008. Retrieved 31 January 2008.
  160. "Baltic, Polish Leaders Rejuvenate Amber Gas Pipeline Proposal as Alternative to Controversial Nord Stream". Global Insight. 6 February 2008. Retrieved 31 January 2009. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  161. Flak, Agnieszka (14 April 2008). "Nord Stream says overland route not an option". Reuters. Retrieved 18 May 2008.
  162. "Pipelines from Russia — Dead souls". The Economist. 15 May 2008. Retrieved 13 June 2008.
  163. (31 October 2008). "Underwater Investigation of Wreck on Greifswalder Bodden Enters Second Phase". Press release. Retrieved on 11 January 2009.
  164. "Peter the Great's lost ship found?". Russia Today. 12 December 2008. Retrieved 25 February 2015.

Related GEM.wiki articles

External resources

External articles

Wikipedia also has an article on Nord Stream (Nord Stream). This article may use content from the Wikipedia article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License].